Types of air purifiers
The reading passage and lecture both have conflicting opinions about whether air purifiers are efficient or not. The author of the reading strongly postulates that there are so many types of air purifiers, which can be used to protect human health from air pollution. On the other hand, the listening adamantly delineates that air filters are not as effective as mentioned in the passage and cast doubts on each of the claims made by the author.
First and foremost, according to the author of the excerpt, HEPA filters remove allergens without producing pollution. Nonetheless, the lecture offsets these points by declaring that HEPA filters are not really effective in removing harmful pollutants which are really very small. In other words, they are too tiny and can easily escape into the environment.
Next, the author contends that ozone-generating air purifies can get rid of any unusual smell and airborne chemicals. In contrast, the lecturer refutes this argument. He clears out that ozone-generating air purifiers are not that helpful. It basically has a high concentration to remove bad smell and chemicals, which can cause lung damage. And these chemicals have the same effect as toxic materials.
The article lastly points out that UV air purifiers remove harmful bacteria from the air. Nevertheless, the speaker in the listening counters these indications by insisting that UV purifiers do not clear away harmful materials in the air. Moreover, basic materials like cigarettes, harmful gases, and other fumes can be removed away by humans.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, lastly, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, really, so, as to, in contrast, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1315.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30241935484 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8134154193 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572580645161 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8892720803 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9285714286 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327420479067 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107280871691 0.0996497079465 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117854423853 0.0662205650399 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188083021534 0.162205337803 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119215340111 0.0443174109184 269% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.