Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage.
Reading: Air purifiers are being used to protect our health from air pollution. Many different types of air purifiers have been invented for better effects. Here are some of the most widely used air purifiers.
HEPA filters are effective at removing allergens such as dust or pollens without producing secondary pollution. The folded fiber sheets of the HEPA filters trap toxic substances when the absorbed particles come into contact with the fiber. Once any large enough particle is absorbed, the filter will produce cleaner air in an eco-friendly way.
Ozone-generating air purifiers remove unpleasant smells and airborne chemicals. This can be done with the help of ozone, which creates a special reaction when it comes in contact with hazardous substances. Also, ozone has a pleasant smell like air fresheners. These two features of ozone-generating filters appeal to many customers.
UV air purifiers directly react with the air and remove harmful bacteria in it. It is especially useful when removing harmful microscopic particles in the
The Reading and the Lecture are both about different type of Air purifiers. The author of the reading feels that there are three type of effective Air purifiers. The Lecturer challanges the claim made by the author. He is of the opinion that this Air purifiers is ineffective.
To begin with, the author of the reading argues that HEPA filters Air purifier are very effective against allergens. The article mentions that HEPA filter includes fiber sheets which can remove toxic substances when dust or pollens comes to its contact. This specific argument is challenged by the Lecturer. He claims that HEPA filters can work only against large dust particle but not unable to trap small particle. Additionally,he says, microscopic particles like airborne, virous are more obnoxious than large particles which can penetrate through this filter.
Secondly, the author suggests that another useful Air purifier is Ozone-generating air purifier which can trap odor and airborne chemicals. In the article, it is said that Ozone also has some sweet smell. The lecturer however disputs this by acknowleding that Ozone is very dangerous to our health which can easily react with our skin. He elaborates on this by bringing up the point that Ozone has some long term obnoxious properties like gasoline and chemically toxic materials.
Finally, the author posits that usefulness of UV Air purifieris, It can remove harmful bacteria from air by reacting with it. The article also mentions that it also work silently without producing any sound pollution. In contrast, the Lecturer opinion is that most Dust and hazardous substances can pass through it. He notes that cigerate smokes, harmful gases can penitrate through UV air purifier which supress it advantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... three type of effective Air purifiers. The Lecturer challanges the claim made by t...
^^^
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , he
...ble to trap small particle. Additionally,he says, microscopic particles like airbor...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, second, secondly, so, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26690391459 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66175994332 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540925266904 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.568566557 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0588235294 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5294117647 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76470588235 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241918346081 0.272083759551 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895150099298 0.0996497079465 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844816392267 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168186040595 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0960691255805 0.0443174109184 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.