universities and the public would benefit if professors appear on TV
The article states that professors, universities and the public would benefit if professors appear on TV and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that it is not completely right gaining those benefits and refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading claim that professor, who appear on TV, could share their point of view with more people than if they were in a classroom for instance. The professor refutes this point by saying that fellow professor will say that those professors are more interesting in entertaining than teaching their students. She states that those professors will be considered a not serious scholar and they will have more problem to obtain money for their research for instance.
Second, the article posits that universities will benefit from this since they will get more exposition as well as the universities, hence the university’ reputation will increase among viewers. However, the professor says that they will spend more time in these points. According to the professor, they won´t be able to attend their universities business.
Third, the reading says that public will gain from professor’s appearance on tv because people will have access to information that otherwise it is impossible. The professor opposes this point by explaining that this material is so deep to the viewers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es each of the author's reasons. First, the reading claim that professor,...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o attend their universities business. Third, the reading says that public will...
^^^^
Line 13, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his material is so deep to the viewers.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, second, so, third, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46759259259 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92052948203 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546296296296 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2886041573 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.1 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351978964418 0.272083759551 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158799623151 0.0996497079465 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147669290601 0.0662205650399 223% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248698138266 0.162205337803 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13968426457 0.0443174109184 315% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.