Uray and Miller test
The reading passage describes an exciting experiment by Miller and Uray, which tried to recreate the early Earth condition. They aimed to find out how organic life started on our planet. Their experiment resulted in the "primordial soup" theory, which explained how the initial elements of life had been created out of simple inorganic materials, such as ammonia, methane, and hydrogen. However, the lecturing professor indicates some recent skepticism about Uray and Miller's conclusion.
According to the professor, the first flaw about their trial is that they introduced continuous electrical shocks to their liquid mixture. Although the primary Earth atmosphere produced huge thunderstorms and electrical discharges, they were not continuous. This may undermine their results and cast doubt on the possibility of the significant amount of amino acids they produced in the flask.
Another problem with the primordial soup test is that the reaction consumed the oxygen content of the experimental environment. The professor highlights that the oxygen-related reactions may not be possible on the early earth, since the oxygen was not as abundant as today.
Finally, the professor mentions that frequent meteorite showers in the early time could have been a significant source of organic materials, as those molecules can endure the harsh condition of outer space. Therefore, the meteorites could have inoculated amino acids to the earth's surface.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-04 | nargess1981 | 90 | view |
- Integrated writing 90
- Do you agree or disagree? why?Teachers are responsible for motivating students to learn. 95
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement.Students learn better when they are not threatened with possible failure.Use reasons and specific examples to support your opinion. 80
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer? 48
- Integrated writing 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ated amino acids to the earths surface.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1253.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66968325792 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92960480341 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642533936652 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0016336418 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.909090909 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125334813903 0.272083759551 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470617973451 0.0996497079465 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823214865902 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0556507346451 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686567651388 0.0443174109184 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.2367328918 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.42419426049 123% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.