A variety of carp are native to Asia, including the bighead and silver carp. More than forty years ago, several species of Asian carp were imported to the southern US to control algae in fish farms.
The lecture discusses the controversy surrounding Asian carp in the Great Lakes water system. Disputing the passage’s argument that the government should shut down shipping locks in the Chicago area, the professor cites several reasons showing that the shutdown is not necessary.
First, the professor says that the DNA traces in the water near Lake Michigan is insufficient to indicate the existence of large-scale Asian carp population. The government argues that the DNA technique is unable to give the exact number of living species in this area. Consequently, it is unsuitable to treat these data as reliable information.
Second, she says that the passage’s claim that Asian carp is an imminent hazard may be exaggerated. In general, imported species can only survive in a self-sustaining way if they have achieved a certain number in an environment. Moreover, more than 90 percent of exotic species fail to surpass this threshold, thus disappearing very quickly. Therefore, there is no need to worry about the threat posed by Asian carp unless they come in large numbers and have found habitats to lay eggs.
Third, the professor contradicts the passage regarding the issue of economic impact. She maintains that the locks are the essential elements for local industry and society in plenty of different aspects, such as commercial shipping, recreational activities, and security. Shutting the locks will directly affect these activities while the impact on the fishery industry is still unclear. Hence, the government should not count on the untenable calculation of fishery industry loss to make the decision of shutting the locks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a self-sustaining way" with adverb for "self-sustaining"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...eral, imported species can only survive in a self-sustaining way if they have achieved a certain number ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, still, therefore, third, thus, while, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39382239382 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87855899311 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629343629344 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3340705767 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.461538462 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76923076923 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149012900993 0.272083759551 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470622295988 0.0996497079465 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477071843846 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851957240399 0.162205337803 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572605017262 0.0443174109184 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.