Wind is a clean, renewable source of energy which holds much promise, and so private companies and governments have been actively exploring ways to commercially exploit wind power.
The passage talks about the disadvantages of wind generators. Disputing the passage’s arguments, the professor cites several pieces of evidence showing that these power utilities are not as problematic as the passage has argued.
First, she claims the location of the wind farms can complement the large amount of land required by them as the passage has argued. Since wind generators are often located off-shore or on high mountains, the structures will not take much space used by human. Hence, although they will occupy plenty of space, these structures will not greatly affect people’s lives.
Second, the professor takes exception to the passage’s claim that wind generators wreak havoc on birds and bats. She maintains that any buildings, including skyscrapers and two-story houses, will bring damage to animals. Moreover, the California wind form cited in the passage is an old type of machine. This machine has turbines that move quickly and is often located near flying or nesting regions of birds, thereby causing great harm to bird populations. However, new types of wind generator have turbines that move slowly, which will make the birds easy to fly pass without getting hurt.
Third, dismissing the passage’s claim that there is aesthetic issue regarding the wind generators, the professor thinks that the location of the power plants will make it nearly invisible to people’s eyes. Once again, she maintains that the wind farms will be built on the mountains or off the shore. Therefore, it is highly probable that people will not have the chance to catch sight of them. Thus, wind farms are not likely to damage the beauty of landscape.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The passage talks about the disadvantage...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...problematic as the passage has argued. First, she claims the location of the wi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill not greatly affect people’s lives. Second, the professor takes exception to...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...easy to fly pass without getting hurt. Third, dismissing the passage’s claim th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, therefore, third, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17777777778 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56477135944 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585185185185 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8912665292 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8571428571 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133668750389 0.272083759551 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539230490407 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346386713488 0.0662205650399 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0857262335267 0.162205337803 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193462479631 0.0443174109184 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.