Vegetable oil as fuel for cars
Both the reading and lecture are about the vegetable oil as fuel for cars. In the passage, the author claims that using vegetable oil is not good for cars. Moreover, the lecturer disagrees with the assertion of the author and states that there are many reasons that show the vegetable oil is a good alternative for fuel.
First, in the passage it is stated that using vegetable oil needs special apparatuses and it can be so expensive for drivers who want to install the mentioned equipment. Nonetheless, the lecturer challenges the opinion of the author and gives evidence that it is not that much expensive for drivers. She points out to some examples to support her idea. First, she says that the equipment would pay itself after a while. She compares the cars which use vegetable oil and other gases. She says that most cars which use vegetable oil can be driven 800 up to 1000 miles for one tank of vegetable oil, but in contrary, the cars which use other gases can be driven just 500 miles per tank. However, she states that the price of equipment come down when most people start using vegetable oil.
Secondly, it is asserted in the passage that using special equipment would be so complex for drivers, but in contrast, the professor disagrees and gives evidence that using these apparatuses is not too hard. She expresses some examples of researches that say the equipment become automatic by due course of time. In addition, she says that there are automatic converters that works automatically.
Finally, in the passage it is mentioned that using vegetable oil can decrease the availability of the crops. However, the professor challenges this idea and says that the vegetable oil which is used for cars as fuel is the waste part of foods which are not used in the restaurants and factories.
In conclusion, the passage and lecture are against each other and challenge themselves. The passage says that it is not good to use vegetable oil as fuel, but by the other hand, the lecture points out some examples to show that vegetable oil is a good alternative for fuel in comparison to other fossils.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 12.0772626932 207% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 366.0 270.72406181 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81693989071 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5427354558 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.407103825137 0.540411800872 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 552.6 419.366225166 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0492534575 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.705882353 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5294117647 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466824709534 0.272083759551 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175665096309 0.0996497079465 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150670573285 0.0662205650399 228% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301444951884 0.162205337803 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144864757915 0.0443174109184 327% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.42419426049 85% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.