Whistler's painting.
The reading and lecture are both about Whistler's painting. Whereas reading states some point to support to painting is Whistler's. But challenges the reading points.
First, according to reading, Whistler's friend collect his painting after Whistler and which is shown in exhibition. In contrast, lecturer refute this point that there is no firm evidence of paint is of Whistler's. Furthermore, his friend have put it in exhibition, its not mean that this painting of Whistler. This may have put it in exhibition because of his friend own it.
Second, reading states that woman in painting resembles the woman in "Symphony in White", therefore this painting belongs to Whistler. However, lecturer states that, there may have been many painters who made this painting. The use of black grey colors does not mean that this painting is made by Whistler.
Third, reading again states that, Whistler always paint butterfly on one of corner in painting which was his sign. In this presented painting, there is butterfly so this painting belongs to Whistler. But in contrast, lecturer states that, this is not convincing evidence. The butterfly is on right bottom corner, Whistler may ave paint it on upper right corner. Furthermore, this may have been painted many years after Whistler's death to show that this painting is of Whistler.
In conclusion, although the reading and listening are about painting, the point of reading are effectively challenged by listening.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ture are both about Whistlers painting. Whereas reading states some point to support to...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, may, second, so, therefore, third, whereas, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 235.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34042553191 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72627508263 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459574468085 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 350.1 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.5904761648 49.2860985944 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.4375 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6875 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207518886461 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925462465436 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087625942959 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13511613526 0.162205337803 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328677707556 0.0443174109184 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.1 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.