The author talks to us about problems and criticisms of tuna farming, in the other hand, the speaker explains the proposed solution to reducing tuna farming problems.
According to the author, female tuna do not lay eggs in captivity, because of this, wild tuna have replaced female tuna. Large quantities of young wild tuna are caged in captivity to sell. This issue causes wild tuna populations have been reduced.
Tuna need high-protein food that almost drove from small fish, so if tuna farming wants to raise on farms, they will probably incur a lot of costs.
When tuna is caged, it will probably be infested with parasites. Parasites affect tuna growth as well as weaken them and sometimes they kill them or make them diseases.
The speaker believes that rising farm tuna causes some problems. However, scientists have some solutions. They use the hormone to help them to lay in captivity, thus tuna farmings don't have to replace young wild tuna with female tuna. as well as they use a portion of food derived from plants, this issue helps them to reduce their cost. Another solution is that staying in deep water prevents infection with the parasite.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...to lay in captivity, thus tuna farmings dont have to replace young wild tuna with fe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...place young wild tuna with female tuna. as well as they use a portion of food deri...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, well, as well as, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 1373.03311258 70% => OK
No of words: 197.0 270.72406181 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89340101523 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3291694392 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604060913706 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0955036209 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3333333333 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4166666667 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353669722792 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138247690723 0.0996497079465 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858653900739 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198369499678 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733733976135 0.0443174109184 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.