Well in my view, I would definitely agree with the statement that people are more willing to help people they don't know than they were in the past because of the following three reasons.
The first and important reason is the internet. The internet plays a significant role in human life. People spend more time their hours every week searching about different subjects. Cyberspace provides a good atmosphere to be aware of the bad conditions that some people are involved in. A sense of humanity is often promoted in cyberspace. People can increase their knowledge about this news and may decide to help people who are in bad conditions such as an earthquake.
The second reason is that these days, most people have a good income that allows them to help other people who are not in the good condition, even people who do not know.
In the past, people could only support their families and sometimes other poor people who knew them. In the fact, these days the economical condition is better than in the past. This advantage provides a good atmosphere to heps, other people they don't know, this plan helps people to teach values such as sens of humanity to their children. In fact, parents who have a good income help people who they don't know to increase the sense of humanity in their children.
These days, there are many different committees and NGOs in our society that accumulate a list of people who need financial assistance. They always suggest rich people help these poor people. They do a lot of advertising and encourage famous people to help them to accumulate financial assistance. For example, in the last days, Lady Gaga asked people to help a boy who is seriously ill and not in a good financial position
- An airship is a type of aircraft that flies using a very large balloon filled with a lighter than air gas Airships were an important means of air transportation before the 1940s but are little used today having been largely replaced by airplanes and helic 80
- It is possible to pass laws that control or place limits on people s behavior but legislation cannot reform human nature Laws cannot change what is in people s hearts and minds 50
- Native to Europe and Asia cheatgrass is an invasive species of grass that is causing problems in North American fields The plant quickly dominates fields that it has invaded and drives out other plants This can cause among other problems severe damage to 71
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 66
- Nowadays people are more willing to help the people who they don t know For example giving food and clothes to the people who need them than they were in the past 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...le are more willing to help people they dont know than they were in the past because...
^^^^
Line 4, column 247, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d atmosphere to heps, other people they dont know, this plan helps people to teach v...
^^^^
Line 4, column 402, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...have a good income help people who they dont know to increase the sense of humanity ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 23, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... their children. These days, there are many different committees and NGOs in our society that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, so, well, for example, in fact, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 301.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74086378738 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43276948085 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491694352159 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6995316134 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1875 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8125 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6875 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.51441623541 0.236089414692 218% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173870634378 0.076458572812 227% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117384824909 0.0737576698707 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.323749470087 0.150856017488 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719205226432 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.