Nowadays people are more willing to help the people who they don't know (For example, giving food and clothes to the people who need them) than they were in the past.
A controversial issue relating to whether people at present are more willing to help another individuals they do not know than they were in the past. Relevant authorities are urged that citizens nowadays are more likely to help people who need assistance than they were in the last decade. From a personal point of view, the above statement is agreeable for some reasons as below.
To begin with, people now are richer and possess a better live environment so that they would spend some money to help others. To be more specific, parents today usually get profitable occupations in the society so that many family members could not only live in a spacious and excellent house but also enjoy a pleasing life. In this case, they would not have to worry about money that not enough to sustain life and even give some extra funds to the people who really need help. Therefore, stable life gives modern people more choices to give clothes or food to someone who needs them. On the contrary, people in the last generation lived in a harsh environment that they did not obtain enough money from working to support their household expenses. Under these circumstances, they would not be able to have extra funds to help other residents.
What is more, currently residents have more effective approaches to find and help people they entirely not know. With the high speed development of the Internet, adults could check some information relating to other individuals who want monetary or material contribution and they would give assistance to those families immediately. On the contrary, people in the previous time barely know about other people who need help for the reason that they did not possess efficient channels to acquire messages, thus they may not be able to give them money or life stocks. For example, last year when I surfed the Internet on my phone, I found someone who got a severe cancer, I send some money directly to his account at once and he was given medical attention eventually. Hence, folks in the contemporary society own useful tools to obtain information about others who are in trouble than ever before.
Finally, people at present are more sympathetic to the sad experience of others. Everyone may have a hard condition that they really need aid from other citizens so that they would assist other persons who live in a difficult condition. From what was discussed above, humans are more willing to give others a warm care.
To sum up, from what was discussed above, residents nowadays are more likely to offer assistance to other individuals who they do not know because they have strong abilities to give others a hand and they could also get helpful information on the website.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-23 | andyweixuan | 76 | view |
| 2023-01-05 | HSNDEK | 90 | view |
| 2022-02-10 | omega_gamage | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-27 | zwoc | 70 | view |
| 2022-10-27 | zwoc | 70 | view |
- TPO 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams 88
- Providing Internet access is as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries 90
- summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the idea that the zebra mussels pose a threat to fish made in the reading 80
- Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they already know how to do well 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, may, really, so, therefore, thus, for example, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2245.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 462.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85930735931 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50517445797 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484848484848 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 728.1 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.7004966903 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.722222222 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.508437204494 0.236089414692 215% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178791600605 0.076458572812 234% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125882453573 0.0737576698707 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.317734209891 0.150856017488 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0974431509089 0.0645574589148 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.