Nowadays people are more willing to help the people who they don t know For example giving food and clothes to the people who need them than they were in the past | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics

Nowadays people are more willing to help the people who they don t know For example giving food and clothes to the people who need them than they were in the past

There are different opinions on whether, nowadays, people help other humankind more than they did in the past or not. Even though some people think that people paid more attention to poor people in the past since they were not as busy as they are today, I believe otherwise, maintaining that nowadays, people take care of each other more than ever in the history of humankind. In what follows, I will delve into the most persuasive reasons to substantiate my perspective.

Without a doubt, the most consequential reason corroborating my stance on this subject is that today, people are more prosperous than before, and wealthy people constitute a large proportion of society. Most people buy stuff more than they need, and when they buy new items, they confer their old things to impoverished people. Plus, some obsolete traditions and beliefs have been removed from modern society. For instance, in my country, old people still believe that they should neither discard nor bestow their old stuff because they might use them in the future. Therefore, this reason manifests that today's people are more civilized and take care of poor people more than they did in the old times.

Although the previous reason is the first one crossing the mind at first glance, another remarkable point deserving some words here is the growth in the public level of literacy. In modern societies, people are mostly educated and hold a university or at least a high school degree. They have been taught to help poor people not only contribute to the poverty eradication process but also raise some feelings of contentment and satisfaction in themselves. Besides, we cannot overlook the contemporary government's role in increasing public awareness. In recent years, governments all around the globe have commenced so many charity movements and constructed homes and schools for impoverished people. Furthermore, with the advent of technology and social media, people have started some unprecedented trends in this regard. Take my folk as an example. During recent years, a movement that is called the wall of kindness has been inaugurated in my country and advertised on social media. Day after day, more people contribute to this movement thanks to the internet and social media. Thus, this point illustrates the fact that the people of the modern world do whatever they can to assist the poor.

To make a long story short, many people are in favor of the notion that nowadays, people are like a machine and have become stone-hearted. Nevertheless, the foregoing points lead us to conclude that today, people help impoverished ones to a great extent because in modern societies people are both more prosperous and erudite than the old-timers.

Votes

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 502, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...es, we cannot overlook the contemporary governments role in increasing public awareness. In...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, at least, for instance, to a great extent

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2285.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11185682327 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6876008175 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530201342282 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 713.7 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.185655321 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.35 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.65 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396110389668 0.236089414692 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122101512663 0.076458572812 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107455684881 0.0737576698707 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272680216941 0.150856017488 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890996600109 0.0645574589148 138% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.