Windmill
The passage and the lecture discuss about the wind power. The lecture talks about advantages as well as disadvantages of wind power.
The first advantage the professor talks about is that wind power is clean source of energy; and this point agrees with the point made in the reading that wind power is clean, safe and environmentally friendly.
The second advantage the professor mentions in his lecture is that wind power is getting affordable enough to compete with power generated using inexpensive coal and oil; this agrees with the point in the passage that wind power is a promising energy source that can serve as an alternative to electricity generated using fossil fuels.
However, professor also mentions in his lecture that wind power lacks energy density and would require large amounts of land in order to generate electricity in useful amounts; this departs from the point made in reading that wind turbines could provide 20 percent of the electricity if they were installed in less than one percent of land in the United States.
A second disadvantage is that wind turbines kill a large number of birds; this point attacks the claim made in passage that wind power is safe and environmentally friendly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...well as disadvantages of wind power. The first advantage the professor talks abo...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
..., safe and environmentally friendly. The second advantage the professor mentions...
^^^
Line 9, column 50, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...disadvantage is that wind turbines kill a large number of birds; this point attacks the claim mad...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 203.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05911330049 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60722866123 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 145.348785872 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453201970443 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 323.1 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0662251656 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 116.422601853 49.2860985944 236% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 171.166666667 110.228320801 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8333333333 21.698381199 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.3589403974 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 53.8541721854 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.0289183223 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 63.6247240618 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.