Work policy
The lecture and the reading are both about the policy of changing a five-day workweek to a four-day workweek. Whereas the reading explains some benefits of that policy, the lecture points out some disadvantages. The lecture casts doubt the main points of the reading by providing three reasons.
First, according to the reading that policy may increase the profits by assuming that with this policy, the workers would feel more rested; in addition, the company may hire more staff. So, the company would not have to pay neither for additional error costs nor for overworking load. However, the lecture disputes this point. The lecturer argues that by adding more staff, the company have to pay the same benefits (insurance and others) whether the person works four or five days per week. In addition, the company needs more space and computers for the new employees. Hence, the corporation will have fewer profits with the new policy.
Second, according to the reading, with that policy the country as a whole may reduce the unemployed rate since the companies will require more people. Nevertheless, the lecture refutes this point. The speaker mentions that the companies may have the same amount of workers without hiring new people. Moreover, the employees will overwork to solve the company´s needs. Therefore, this policy will not reduce the employee rate in the country.
Finally, the reading points out that workers would have more free time to themselves. In the other hand, the lecture points out that this free time may result in decreasing the ability of the workers. In addition, this may produce the workers to lose their job or to lose the posibility to be awarded or promoted because the companies would prefer a five day- worker instead of a four day-worker.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture both discusses a new work policy, the main points made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecturer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The lecture and the reading are both abo...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reading by providing three reasons. First, according to the reading that pol...
^^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... pay for error costs and overwork load. However the lecture disputes this point. The le...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e fewer profits with the new policy. Second, according to the reading, with t...
^^
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...t of workers without hiring new people. moreover, the employees will overwork to solve t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce the employee rate in the country. Finally, the reading points out that wor...
^^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
... produce the workers to lose their job. moreover, the companies would prefer five-day wo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...four day-worker to give a promotion. In conclusion, although the reading and ...
^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ectively challenged by the lecturer.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, however, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, whereas, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13815789474 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44204819296 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450657894737 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 466.2 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 17.0 8.23620309051 206% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 2.5761589404 349% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2550771197 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.1 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112101075976 0.272083759551 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359472654789 0.0996497079465 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567268399408 0.0662205650399 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0678431923076 0.162205337803 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369020842378 0.0443174109184 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.94 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.