You’ve just read about three ways to save Torreya taxifolia. Unfortunately, none of these three options provides a satisfactory solution. About the first solution-reestablishing Torreya in the same location-that’s unlikely to be successful, because of what’s happening to the coolest dampest areas within torreya’s micro-climate. These areas are being strongly affected by changes in the climate of the larger region. This could be because global warming has contributed to an increase in overall temperatures in the region or because wetlands throughout Florida have been drained. Either way, many areas across the region are becoming drier, so it’s unlikely that Torreya would have the conditions it needs to survive anywhere within its original Florida micro-climate.
Now about the second solution, relocating Torreya far from where it currently grows, well, let’s look at what happened when humans helped another tree, the black locust tree, move north to a new environment. When they did this, the black locust tree spread so quickly that it killed off many plants and trees in the new environment, and some of these plants and trees were themselves already in danger of becoming extinct . So assisted migration can have unpredicted outcomes for the new environment.
Third, research centers are probably not a solution either. That’s because the population of Torreya trees that can be kept in the centers will probably not be able to resist diseases. For a population of trees to survive a disease, it needs to be relatively large and it needs to be genetically diverse. Tree populations in the wild usually satisfy those criteria but research centers would simply not have enough capacity to keep a large an diverse population of Torreya trees, so trees in such centers will not be capable of surviving diseases in the long term.
the article states that Torreya taxifoha, Florid's specific green tree, will become extinct as soon as posible, scientists proposed three choices to decrease this process. However, the professor explians that these proposal presented in the article are not proper solution and refutes each of the author's reasons.
first, the reading claims that restablish the tree could become effective. the northern part of Florida is the origion of this tree and may be Florida's climate can help the growth of the tree. the professor opposes this point by explaining that the global warming affects the climate of the florida and that is not suitable place for this purpose. according to the professor, the Northern part of Florida is drier than past.
second, the article posits that relocating the tree far from its origion where is cooler, can call assistant migration, might help the decline extinction of the tree. In contrast, the professor provides an example of negatively effect of this proposal, she says that a specific kind of tree moved to another area, nor become thrived nor left other species intact.
third, the reading says that research centers is another opition for maintaining Torreya form extinction. because those place can both protect and conduct more research on Torreya. the professor cast doubt on this point by saying that those plase are not resist disease as Torreya's natural environment. because the tree habitat not only must be large but also, must be diverse. she also states that, research centers are not able to protect Torreya.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the article states that Torreya taxifoha, F...
^^^
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this proposal' or 'these proposals'?
Suggestion: this proposal; these proposals
...s. However, the professor explians that these proposal presented in the article are not proper...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...es each of the authors reasons. first, the reading claims that restablish the...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ablish the tree could become effective. the northern part of Florida is the origion...
^^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...limate can help the growth of the tree. the professor opposes this point by explain...
^^^
Line 7, column 349, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
...is not suitable place for this purpose. according to the professor, the Northern part of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
... of Florida is drier than past. second, the article posits that relocating the...
^^^^^^
Line 19, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Third
...nor left other species intact. third, the reading says that research centers...
^^^^^
Line 19, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...or maintaining Torreya form extinction. because those place can both protect and conduc...
^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 182, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...t and conduct more research on Torreya. the professor cast doubt on this point by s...
^^^
Line 19, column 304, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...isease as Torreyas natural environment. because the tree habitat not only must be large...
^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 379, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...ust be large but also, must be diverse. she also states that, research centers are ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, as to, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24110671937 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38856865042 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573122529644 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9478402516 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 4.19205298013 286% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109027947991 0.272083759551 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433822789203 0.0996497079465 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309622857339 0.0662205650399 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0643699528471 0.162205337803 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466806061082 0.0443174109184 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.