The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The above bar graph gives information about the frequency of eating in fast food restaurants in the USA during the period of ten years from 2003 until 2013.
Overall, it is clear that high proportion of American citizens have eaten fast food one a week in 2003 and 2006. While, in 2013 they have gone to restaurants once or twice a month.
According to the chart, almost 5% of American people ate at fast food eating places every day which was reduced and remained still for both 2006 and 2013. People who went several times a week to those places in all three years were higher than 15%, but in 2006 reached 20 percent. Great percentage of individuals in USA with more than 30 were eating one a week in those restaurants.
In 2013, high percentage of the whole graph with almost 35% devoted to people who ate once or twice a week in fast food restaurants. Near 15 proportion ate at those eating places a few times a year which rose to exact 15% in two other years. Finally, as like every day figure, percentage of citizen who ate never at fast food restaurants were 5% in 2003 that had a slight decline to near 4% in other years.
- In some places young people find it difficult to communicate with older people Why is this What are the solutions 87
- People who have committed a crime cannot be allocated to just one group with high ages In some countries a high proportion of criminal acts are committed by teenagers This essay is going to talk about the significant reasons for this issue 56
- Some people think all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both views and give your 89
- In many countries people throw away a lot of food from restaurants and shops Why do you think people waste food in this way What can be done to reduce the amount of food thrown away 73
- living in cities or countryside is one of the main decision for humans to make discuss advantages and disadvantages for both of them and give your own opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.40952380952 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32074348866 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3749704492 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.888888889 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282841051324 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123335328394 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732135927164 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183655031144 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292105960887 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.81 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.