living in cities or countryside is one of the main decision for humans to make. discuss advantages and disadvantages for both of them and give your own opinion.
One of the debating issues during human’s lives from the day that they have had several types of places in order to choose their favorite one to live, has been where the best location for individuals to live is. Two main choices have been in the city or countryside which both simultaneously have pros and cons. This essay is going to talk about benefits and drawbacks for both of them as well as the writer’s opinion which is interested in living in metropolises.
On the one side of this issue, living in the big cities have gained advantages and disadvantages at the same time. One of the main of its benefits has been easy access and public transport for all the residents. In fact, comparing to rural areas, in cities everyone could use any kind of transport such as bus, train, underground so it is more convenient but in countryside if a dweller do not have their own car, they will have so much trouble to get around. Another advantage is related to not only wide range of amenities which have been allocated to various part of society like better education or universities and jobs, but also the lots of choices of stores and markets that citizen have to go and shop such as chain stores. Moreover, much more facilities for entertainment such as theaters or museums and also lively bars and restaurants. For the dark side of this type of living should consider the congestion of traffic which has propelled metropolises to not only have more air pollution, but also make an incessant roar from the vehicles. This issue has led these cities to have less relaxing moments and have a high pace of living which has made people to be more nervous and have lots of health problems such as respiratory diseases.
On the other hand, exactly like cities, countryside has several benefits and also drawbacks. The first advantages which could not be overlooked is the comfort and less stressing life in the suburb as a result of low speed of live. And this is because of fewer population, less noise making from cars and industrial companies. This has led people to have a better health condition for both physical and mental circumstance. Furthermore, resulting of having less bumper-to-bumper traffic, their air pollution are much lower. In addition, the cost of living may be lower than metropolises, and also dwellers would have bigger house than high-rise flats with small dimension. Despite those benefits which was mentioned, there are some adverse drawbacks, too. The main one is fewer job opportunities and also facilities for both entertainment and education than cities. This has propelled some individuals to waste a great deal of their day to day life so as to commute between the cities and their living areas on the outskirt.
In conclusion, regarding all the satisfying and negative aspects of both of the locations, I myself prefer living in cities especially in my twenties in order to earn more money so for my retirement years I would be able to live out of the cities. Overall, everyone should consider all the factors and then select their chief temptation to enjoy their life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 387, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...benefits and drawbacks for both of them as well as the writer’s opinion which is intereste...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 949, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...e a great deal of their day to day life so as to commute between the cities and their li...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, regarding, so, then, well, as to, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 10.4138276553 269% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 41.998997996 179% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2580.0 1615.20841683 160% => OK
No of words: 533.0 315.596192385 169% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84052532833 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.20363070211 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71076363045 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 176.041082164 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502814258912 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 812.7 506.74238477 160% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.9289971213 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.857142857 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.380952381 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90476190476 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264204762309 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839614272774 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640380194838 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17706743552 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678632068113 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.