Corruption
It is suggested that in numerous nations, corruptions still exist pervasively regardless of the enactments of strict laws. Subsequently, supportive opinions about the allowance for corruptions are documented as well as opposed ones. From my point of view, I side with the latter group although the former obtain its own reasons as follows.
To commence with, the presentation of bribery would play an important role in the society, in particular, the economically disadvantaged regions. Obviously, corruption would ensure better income for the receivers to decrease the financial burdens in the family; in other words, they would secure adequate money to purchase desirable products. In evidence, the average wage of teachers in Vietnam is 5 million dong meanwhile they would demand greater quantity to pay for daily expenses such as fuel, electrical bills or tuition fees of their offspring, which means that corruption is reasonable. Furthermore, that the corruption would stabilize earnings for inhabitants may be reckoned as an incentive for them to perform better in working since they are not concerned too much about financial problems.
On the other hand, eliminating the corruption in society would be a momentous step to guarantee the equality for the citizens. Admittedly, in some nations, the encroachment of power to gain money is implicitly transform corruption into concepts. This would directly induce the citizens’ worries about collecting sufficient budgets and donate to other individuals with the hope to receive assistance or even ingratiation. To illustrate, in Vietnam, the fundamental condition to secure an occupation with salary at approximate 8 million dong in state-run office is 200 million dong, which is not national law but the social established rules. Hence, for wealthy citizens, this is not an enormous investment; nonetheless, for the poverty, the inability to bear money would put them into the tragedies such as losing the opportunity to accomplish desirable careers or not gain assistances from authority. In other words, it would be reckoned as a tytification of discrimination towards poor inhabitants.
Equally important, national developments would be hindered by the popularity of corruption, especially the economy. Firstly, the inclination towards prosperous individuals who are capable of obtaining large quantity of money to secure high positions rather than well-qualified ones with limited budgets would degrade the quality of management system. In some circumstances, by corruption, some citizens without education in poor nations are abusing power to manipulate the employees possessing better skills. This would influence the working environment since they do not want to follow inferiors directors; worsen, internal conflicts are inevitable and eventually, the working efficiency would decrease. Secondly, bribery would motivate the implementation of illegal actions which would disturb the stability of community. In evidence, some firms may take advantages of money to ingratiate the authority with a hope to gain private benefits such as dodging taxation, acquiring illegal contracts or transporting banned products, which would have repercussions on national budgets.
With the mentioned statements, corruption would be an effective method to improve income for the citizens and ensure better performance in working. Nevertheless, the justice of citizens and national developments would be more rational to cease this propensity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'transformed'.
Suggestion: transformed
...nt of power to gain money is implicitly transform corruption into concepts. This would di...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...rimination towards poor inhabitants. Equally important, national developments would ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, in particular, such as, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 41.998997996 179% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 8.3376753507 360% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2990.0 1615.20841683 185% => OK
No of words: 518.0 315.596192385 164% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7722007722 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1635879136 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 176.041082164 164% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555984555985 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 939.6 506.74238477 185% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.76152304609 294% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8963900617 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.380952381 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.95238095238 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170893645177 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687293291066 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901620569703 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130522276327 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785573628043 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 189.0 78.4519038076 241% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.33 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.