How to make oneself study
Humans have varied capabilities that enrich the world based on Gardner’s 1983 theory of multiple intelligence which are developed in school where basic knowledge is obtained. But a fact exists where instead of nurturing potentials, some schools remain the same old worksheet-textbook teaching style which could limit the development of individual capabilities. If this is the case, the probability of difficulty in the studying phase is possible as there exist the multiple intelligence where there is a time interval of comprehension depending on the intelligence acquired. As observed in school, there is no such thing as average to no good students. It is just that the lessons presented were not able to reach and develop the capability of an individual. Considering this fact, when a certain intelligence type considers a lesson difficult may result in either diligent studying or disinterest. In the case of disinterest, there is a little to no perseverance at all, this is where the notion of average to no good students comes in. To counter this struggle, the Study While You Play Approach will enable studying mode on lessons an individual has difficulty comprehending.
Disinterest towards a lesson is normal considering the multiple intelligence theory but studying is inevitable since there is a need to understand a lesson to grasp an entire course of study. This approach is an effective way to get an individual to study without forcing himself to do so. Studying with force will just stress out the brain and makes it even more difficult to get the lessons into memory. From the phrase itself, While You Play, the study time is incorporated into the daily activities done by an individual. To do that, one must spare at least 10 minutes to scan and review previous lessons. Whatever is read during that first 10 minutes should be the things recalled by the individual when guilt comes during procrastination. During the process of recall there is a probability of forgetting some details and here comes the urge to remember it again. This will unconsciously force the individual to once again scan the handouts or ask somebody whom he knew has the knowledge or can help solve what he is trying to remember. This eagerness to remember is human nature that cannot be shunned by other factors, therefore, finding ways to remember. The option of choosing handouts or researching is more likely than merely asking somebody for accuracy, with this, the individual will be able to gather another learning without forcing himself to study. After this stage, spare another 10 minutes to do the same scanning and recalling process until such time, everything is familiarized.
Making oneself study is the hardest phase a disinterested individual needs to overcome and this approach simplifies the struggle especially for lessons that include memorization though it is not effective with numbers except if it is merely addition, subtraction, multiplication, or division of numbers where the average brain can process without using a piece of paper, this approach is proven effective. Instead of just feeling the guilt of not studying, try this simple technique and see the result.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1025, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... where the notion of average to no good students comes in. To counter this struggle, the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'need'?
Suggestion: need
...ardest phase a disinterested individual needs to overcome and this approach simplifie...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, therefore, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2679.0 1615.20841683 166% => OK
No of words: 518.0 315.596192385 164% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17181467181 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00717737844 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 176.041082164 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507722007722 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 854.1 506.74238477 169% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.403067123 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.571428571 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42857142857 7.06120827912 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124351793293 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03565315735 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508378280737 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0913536306163 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218590986265 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.33 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.