The issue raises a debate about problem of what place in people's lives does television play. The point of dispute calls for its analysis by various perspectives. However, it seems that television has many useful functions to play in every one's life, for some it's relaxation, for some it's the companion, for some it's wasting time.
There are a plethora of problems associated with this phenomenon. The most prominent is that people spend a lot of time watching television. Moreover, they become addicted to it, even neglect the necessary and more important things such as meals, sleep and work; they further can get diseases as obesity, hypertension and depression, because their sedentary lifestyle and lack of communications with friends. To cite an example on this matter, a study conducted by the University of Western Australia has shown that 25 percent of viewers develop depression.
On the other hand, some people adopt an opposite view and tend to believe that television is grate companion for them. People who live alone can be involved in TV shows by answering questions and writing letters to TV shows heroes. Moreover, they can watch films from their childhood and health shows what is enjoyable. Furthermore, after work people can relax watching comedies or music programs. TV provides a wide range channels such as travel, food, gardening, sport and laws, which increase their knowledge and confidence.
Summing up all the points above, it can be concluded that impact of television on human lives is significant, although the given negative effects should not be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...life, for some its relaxation, for some its the companion, for some its wasting tim...
^^^
Line 2, column 559, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... percent of viewers develop depression. On the other hand, some people adopt an ...
^^^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ncrease their knowledge and confidence. Summing up all the points above, it can ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19379844961 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75188339284 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7031797049 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.076923077 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252566644707 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07620348096 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127329590921 0.0667982634062 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144608578823 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.16263186505 0.056905535591 286% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.67 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.