Recently, the phenomenon of migration to developed countries in the 18th century and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that this social incident and its problem for developed countries is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that looking at the effects of this migration on people's lifestyle can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, moving to a better place can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that increasing urban areas, as well as technological advancements, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered higher rates of crime and violation in England during the 18th century. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both expansion of cities and social problems apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of culture, migrating from an undeveloped country to a new place might increase the consequences of cultural shock. Moreover, fundamental aspects of proposing a proper solution for such issues relate to this reality that the demerits of entering a new country pertain to dramatic changes in lifestyle. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by the prestigious University of Chicago has asserted that the downside of departing poor countries and pouring into developed ones is correlated negatively with severe effects. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of overcoming the problems.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of inspecting root causes due to migration far outweigh its drawbacks. It is obvious that advantages of solving this problem prove the significance of community.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 435, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...ing at the effects of this migration on peoples lifestyle can be a plus, and I will ana...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, if, look, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 301.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50830564784 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13004419004 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 139.433497537 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621262458472 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.7545153985 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.166666667 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0833333333 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170095947892 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567735706501 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448265088169 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095717782276 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631846838092 0.0609392437508 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.17 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 55.0591133005 218% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.