In the 18th century due to industrialization, a lot of people migrated to developed countries. This affected and increased problems in developed countries. What is your opinion about this?
The phenomenon of migration to the developed countries in 18th century has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably lead to the moot question, “did the migration to first world countries on that time due to industrialization increase problems in those countries?” Whereas, it is a widely held view that mass migration in 18th century actually benefited those countries. I will discuss the controversial aspects of that immigration throughout this essay.
In terms of advantage, the industrialization required huge labor force in the field such as heavy metal industry, textile industry and even in the construction industry in developed countries. For instances, the construction of high rise buildings emerged in the United States in 18th century, which demanded huge skilled and unskilled labors in that industry. As a result, the immigration department of foreign ministry invited a lot of people from East European and Asian countries to fill the vacancy in these mega projects.
Another facet worth discussing here is that the increased number of migrated people inspired many local people to start small enterprise, which also boosted the micro economy of those countries. A study conducted by the University of Adelaide revealed that those small businesses contributed up to 5% in the GDP of South Australia in the 18th century at the dawn of industrial booming.
Despite the inevitability of the fact, some people believe that huge social problems raised due to increased population in the developed countries. But, these people overlooked the industrial and economic development that took place by those migrated people. There might happened some problem regarding accommodations, foods etc. at the beginning of that migration; however, I believe the socioeconomic growth the developed countries witnessed due to these on demand migration outweighs the few drawbacks in many aspects.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... increase problems in those countries?” Whereas, it is a widely held view that mass mig...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, look, regarding, so, whereas, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.5418719212 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 31.9359605911 150% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56164383562 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12027462211 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575342465753 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.685166149 50.4703680194 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.636363636 104.977214359 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5454545455 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395472770592 0.242375264174 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124872900569 0.0925447433944 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853806939138 0.071462118173 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223982973738 0.151781067708 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103593642526 0.0609392437508 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.94827586207 201% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... increase problems in those countries?” Whereas, it is a widely held view that mass mig...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, look, regarding, so, whereas, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.5418719212 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 31.9359605911 150% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56164383562 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12027462211 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575342465753 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.685166149 50.4703680194 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.636363636 104.977214359 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5454545455 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395472770592 0.242375264174 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124872900569 0.0925447433944 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853806939138 0.071462118173 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223982973738 0.151781067708 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103593642526 0.0609392437508 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.94827586207 201% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.