The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of learning more than one language and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance of complex precedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both online teaching and consequenthly postive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that cognitive skills can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, improving teaching skills can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discoverd current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both bilangal students and social ability apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of public arena, education ability might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the creative processes is correlated negatively with brillint future. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of common phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of foreign languages far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72765957447 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17030129821 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.706382978723 0.580463131201 122% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8654554296 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.363636364 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144333394502 0.242375264174 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464860701237 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590324019963 0.071462118173 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.072207407888 0.151781067708 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049800898237 0.0609392437508 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.4 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.