Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of music learning in the schools and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many the significance of complex proceduers is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number individuals. I am inclined to believe that music teaching can be a plus and I will analyze that throught this essay.
From a genral standpoint, promoting learning in the children life can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that social behavior, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiments which discovered current policies. Hence, beneficial ramifications of both social development and interactive communication apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, artistic activity might increase the consequences of daily homework . As tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with wasting time. Thus, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of outdoor activity.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of improving artistic skills far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rease the consequences of daily homework . As tangible example, some scientific re...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76595744681 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25601061764 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.702127659574 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5756854747 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.181818182 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104373157656 0.242375264174 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0313861841086 0.0925447433944 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464654284404 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0507975881214 0.151781067708 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300760684838 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.2 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.