Lifestyle affects health, how should health/ medical department responds?
Recently, the phenomenon of affecting of health and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such as issue is regarded thorougly both constuctive and consqeuently positive by a substantial by number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that lifestyle can be plus and I will analyze that throuout this essay.
From a general standpoint, health department can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that medical department, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextrecably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiments which discovered the current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both healthy life style and doing physical activity apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, medical care might increase the consequences of this monitoring of healthy. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with exercise. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion healthy foods.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of responding of medical departments far outweigh its backdraws. Not only do the advantage of running prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint the thorny issues' potential implications.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-05-05 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
2024-05-05 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
2021-06-28 | Behnaz fallah | 85 | view |
2021-02-07 | honorrr | 88 | view |
2021-02-05 | honorrr | 88 | view |
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? 88
- There is an increasing trend around the world to have a small family rather than a large family. What are some of the advantages and disadvantages of having a small family rather than a large family? 88
- more information is available online and library books has no place.agree or disagree? 88
- Imitating celebrities in sports and movies good or bad? do you agree? 85
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65531914894 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22938073858 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.685106382979 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3717427627 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.818181818 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168132778937 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486678195244 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636122318128 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0813155108735 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325860136378 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.93 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65531914894 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22938073858 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.685106382979 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3717427627 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.818181818 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168132778937 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486678195244 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636122318128 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0813155108735 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325860136378 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.93 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.