In this competitive era, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the role of combining the students of the same abilities in the same group across the world, be it an affluent or impoverished nation. In this essay, I will elaborate group studies with equal mental capacity foster the friendly environment to learn at one's full potential.
At the outset, there are myriad of reasons to encourage the group studies. First, the most conspicuous one is that separating the students according to the level of their learning abilities makes the medium of teaching easy to deliver. Not only can teachers make their lesson plans more effectively, but students can also enhance their knowledge and broaden their horizons with much ease and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits will keep the students in a preponderant position, as far as the performing in the study is concerned.
T embark this, another pivotal facet of the argument is that making a group of all the students having equal mental capacities can speed up their educational journey, Besides they can be challenged to increase their learning level as well as academic achievements rather than sheer wasting time in learning something less challenging for them; for instance, according to the report published in "Journal of Education", stream-lined learning is gaining all the support from education experts around the world. Hence, it hardly needs to mention that associated benefits of studying together will have a far-reaching positive effect on the academic achievements.
To recapitulate from the arguments aforementioned, one can conclude that the upsides of teaching students in groups having same learning abilities are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, so, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97657521323 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610714285714 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.5024630542 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 120.924218694 50.4703680194 240% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 166.444444444 104.977214359 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1111111111 20.9669160288 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239615488458 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930561204378 0.0925447433944 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369327040957 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134082533417 0.151781067708 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387299501122 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 12.6369458128 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.3980295567 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 71.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.