One of the most conspicuous trends in today's world is the colossal upsurge in combing the students of the same abilities in the same group. There is widespread worry that this practice is not good and would only lead to a myriad of concerns. In my opinion, this apprehension is unwarranted and so should be rejected. In this essay, I shall elaborate my opinion.
There is a deluge of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that separating the students according to the level of their learning abilities makes the medium of teaching easy to deliver. Not only can this distribution benefits the teachers, but it also can give enhanced opportunities for academic prosperity to the students. It hardly needs mention that this merit stands students in good stead as far as their learning is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of my argument is that making a group of all the students having equal mental capacities can speed up their educational journey. Besides, they can be challenged to increase their learning level as well as academic achievements, rather than wasting time in learning something less challenging for them. For example, according to the report published in "Journal of Education," stream-lined learning is gaining all the support from educational experts around the world.
In the view of arguments outlined above, one can conclude that benefits of teaching students in groups having same learning abilities are too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
... published in 'Journal of Education,' stream-lined learning is gaining all t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, so, well, for example, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1252.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19502074689 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96065578681 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55601659751 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5892284095 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.333333333 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24717486519 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794071171264 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427744996238 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142595505287 0.151781067708 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468242134526 0.0609392437508 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.