The advanced medical technology will expand human’s life. Do you think it is a blessing or a curse?
Recently, the phenomenon of advanced medical technologies and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of expanding humans' life is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that medical advancements can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the decisive role of modern medical technologies in human's life can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the length of human's life, as well as medical advancements, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered modern medical devices. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both human lifespan and cutting-edge devices apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, human's life expansion might increase the consequences of healthcare technologies. Moreover, fundamental aspects of a medical technologist could relate to this reality that the demerits of boosting life expectancy rates pertain to medical advancements. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of medical devices is correlated negatively with robotic surgery. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of technological advances.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of medical technology advancements far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of cutting-edge technologies prove the significance of medical equipment, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ed by many that the matter of expanding humans life is highly beneficial, such issue i...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81954887218 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35552377834 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635338345865 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3741556312 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307043131989 0.242375264174 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985411587698 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473967790111 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177109265082 0.151781067708 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322378693558 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.02 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.