Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person’s age. In the workplace, these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against older workers be made illegal?
The person age plays a very important roles to assign and finalize the age discrimination facts. They are frequently using this increments in the work places. In this essays, I explain about the discrimination for old workers should be prohibited.
On the one hand, most of the employees are not supporting the unfavour treat of the old age employes. After the retirement age, the company could isolate the aged person from the industries and companies to regret to provide the benefits. It could give chance for the youngers to survive in a best way. Most of the countries of facing an unemployment rates are higher due to this issues. It could be rectified by this action and discrimination should acts against the old workers.
On the other hand, the legacy labours are demanding this principle acts which could benefits for them in later years for them and their offsprings. They occupied their valuable seats to the next generation in a better way to sustain in a tremendous way. This is a paramount point for these peoples to fight for their rights.
In conclusion, the sympathy could survive everywhere. They mainly targeted the discrimination to control over the old aged employees but unfortunately the companies and industries are focusing on these harassment in the society. These type of interruption should be bleached nowadays by our representatives to deliver a good policy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'role'?
Suggestion: role
The person age plays a very important roles to assign and finalize the age discrimi...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... this increments in the work places. In this essays, I explain about the discriminat...
^^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[2]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'regret providing'.
Suggestion: regret providing
...on from the industries and companies to regret to provide the benefits. It could give chance for ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...e chance for the youngers to survive in a best way. Most of the countries of faci...
^
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...an unemployment rates are higher due to this issues. It could be rectified by this a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
...manding this principle acts which could benefits for them in later years for them and th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a tremendous way" with adverb for "tremendous"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...t generation in a better way to sustain in a tremendous way. This is a paramount point for these pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this harassment' or 'these harassments'?
Suggestion: this harassment; these harassments
...ompanies and industries are focusing on these harassment in the society. These type of interrupt...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 230.0 242.827586207 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08260869565 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96265667832 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 139.433497537 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552173913043 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2124423452 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5 104.977214359 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4285714286 20.9669160288 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21428571429 7.25397266985 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.33497536946 150% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235097525557 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827326879522 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824911070659 0.071462118173 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157166055665 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890355171236 0.0609392437508 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.