Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter, whether air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world, and ordinary people can not get advantages from it. Whereas some people agree with this thought, I sanguinely disagree with it. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that the air travel has made long-distance travel possible. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed research which revealed that air travel is benefiting the ordinary student as well, and the student could now travel foreign university for higher study. Thus, the beneficial ramification of air travel apparently can be seen.
On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that air travel is expensive and not everyone can afford it, which makes it only beneficial for the rich people. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, this is the one-sided story. As a tangible example, research conducted by a reputed organization reveal that air travel has increased significantly over the past few years, and most flyers are from the lower income group only. Hence, It is correct to presume a preconceived notion of the skeptics.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the side, I profoundly believe that the Air travel benefits the ordinary people as well. Not only do the air travel for ordinary people prove its significance, but also tell the benefits of cheapest air travel options.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 256, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the cheapest'.
Suggestion: of the cheapest
...ignificance, but also tell the benefits of cheapest air travel options.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, then, thus, well, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13382899628 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72115404125 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561338289963 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.931034482759 537% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5294908285 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.083333333 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.459634138971 0.242375264174 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16283259594 0.0925447433944 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132505738471 0.071462118173 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284351517149 0.151781067708 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0940244970943 0.0609392437508 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.