Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter, whether the imported food exerts positive impacts on our lives. Whereas some people say that imported food does not have any positive impact on our lives, I sanguinely believe that It does. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that imported food bring positive effects in our lives. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I conducted research which disclosed that students who regularly used to have imported food were positive in their thoughts and attitude. Thus, the beneficial ramification of imported food apparently can be seen.
On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that imported food is nothing, but the waste of money, even the local food give the same impacts. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, this is the one-sided story. Researchers from a reputed firm conducted research, which revealed that consumption of imported food exerts a positive impact on our lives. Thus, this can be presumed a preconceived notion.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of imported food far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the imported food prove its significance, but also pinpoints implications of not consuming it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve in their thoughts and attitude. Thus, the beneficial ramification of imported ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, so, then, thus, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1262.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23651452282 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76357269996 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589211618257 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3346153657 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.166666667 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32941576925 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121584485889 0.0925447433944 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104796923865 0.071462118173 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200810461941 0.151781067708 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677352857417 0.0609392437508 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.