Because of global economy many goods including what we use daily produced by others countries have to be transported for long distance. To extend do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
The importance of use daily produced goods by other countries have to be transported for long distance which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that is is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will elaborate both negative and positive effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that transported goods from other countries is beneficial because we can taste variety of fruits and vegetables. Another pivotal aspects of this trend is that masses have establishment of different branded showrooms like Adidas and Nike as well as it leads to employment opportunities. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that transportation of goods for long distance increase the pollution of environment. Besides, people have neglect the values of traditional goods due to usage of other modern products. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of transported goods for long distance are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not overlooked either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y other countries have to be transported for long distance which was always debat...
^^
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: is
...oversial with many people claiming that is is beneficial while others reject this not...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 211, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'overlook'
Suggestion: overlook
...ess, its potential drawbacks should not overlooked either.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36538461538 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92502718341 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592307692308 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.796007317 50.4703680194 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.25 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221716633296 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073029664015 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825828912317 0.071462118173 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132690802938 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335301533196 0.0609392437508 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.