In some countries the number of shootings increase because many people have guns at home to what extend do you agree or disagree.
Surely there has no time in history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on the typical day reveals increase the number of shootings has been one of the most prominent topics on the contemporary discussion. People have been intrigued to analyze and explain many people have guns at home regarding this, I partially agree to this argument and I will discuss reasons behind this notion in further elaborating paragraphs.
To begin with, one compelling argument in favour of my stance on this issue has to do with the fact number of shooting increases. This is because people have shoots unnecessary time and they have show their happiness with the help of shooting. As a result it destroy lots of property and sometime happen unnecessary death of masses. To put this into perspective a survey conducted that thousands of death are recorded due to number of shootings.
Looking back to the introduction, one could also argue that many people have guns at home. Due to this gun have used for the security purpose. As a result masses think that guns are helpful to protect the property as well as dangerous situation.
Hence, based on the arguments above, we can conclude that increase number of shootings not only helpful but also dangerous. Therefore, I believe that It is the responsibility of masses which way of usage of guns.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'destroys'?
Suggestion: destroys
...th the help of shooting. As a result it destroy lots of property and sometime happen un...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, look, regarding, so, therefore, well, as to, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1144.0 1207.87684729 95% => OK
No of words: 232.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93103448276 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72806351811 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590517241379 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3239118857 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305609121258 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982886050659 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756921140658 0.071462118173 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172917908959 0.151781067708 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651072036177 0.0609392437508 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.