Business and financial organizations need to hard work to environmental challenges.
Recently, the phenomenon of environmental challenges and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of business issues is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe business organizations can be a plus, and I will examine that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, environmental problems can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that government organizations, as well as private companies, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered environmental changes. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and facing challenges apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, financial organizations might increase the consequences of hard-working organizations. Moreover, unique aspects of environmental changes related to this reality that the demerits of environmental effects pertain to government policies. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of damaging the environment is correlated negatively with damaging effects. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of environmental policies.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of environmental reforms far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of hard-work business companies prove the significance of environmental solutions, but also pinpoint perfect solutions implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 6.09311740891 5.00649968141 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.55171735818 2.71678728327 131% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655870445344 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5590276254 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.416666667 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257531815068 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839980701176 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802839406259 0.071462118173 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141163644875 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619264360174 0.0609392437508 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.04 11.5310837438 156% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.