The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems. So
who do you think should be responsible to solve it? Is it the governments,
organizations or each individual?
Nowadays, the environmental issues have become a long-running dispute among the public all around the world, which leads to a moot question "who is responsible for the environmental problems?" Although some people are of the opinion that governments should be accountable for it, I tend to believe that both the government and citizens should be responsible.
From an environmental point of view, environmental issues are indeed bound up tightly with carbon emissions, which means they might lead to both factories' pollutants and the ozone layer. For example, a group of reputable social scientists, working at a prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to establish the correlation between air pollution and harmful effects of pollution as well as climate change. Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the contention that a perfect solution is correlated negatively with not only sea-level rises but also marine creatures and preservation of ecology.
In medical terms, environmental development crisis is undoubtedly attributable to dealing with the problem, in that it would lead to fighting off pollution, levying high taxes, and environmental changes. A well-known example of such attributions is chemical pesticides, which is cause for concern since they had been mistaken to take more crops for granted. Had they provided farmers with profits in advance, they might have the opportunity to damage the environment. Thus, environmental reforms could play an imperative role in suffering from diseases.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that both governments and people are responsible for protecting the environment. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s, the environmental issues have become a long-running dispute among the public all around the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74358974359 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2803747026 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644688644689 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.1866786256 50.4703680194 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.8 104.977214359 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0429647355178 0.242375264174 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0150062011065 0.0925447433944 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0269449250786 0.071462118173 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0323633932733 0.151781067708 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356608208095 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 12.6369458128 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 9.94827586207 206% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.