Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of effective learning and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of n is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that employment can be a plus, and I will examine that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, learning methods can prove the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that educational policies, as well as leave entitlements, are inextricably bound up. Accoring to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of effective employees. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and required comfort apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, requiring time might increase the consequences of educational needs. Moreover, unique aspects of job satisfaction relate to this reality that the demerits of studying lessons pertain to job opportunities. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of distracting from studying is correlated negatively with job losses. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of requiring peace.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of employment issues far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of educational systems prove the significance of effective workers, but also pinpoint employers implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71255060729 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31051321988 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65991902834 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0327497821 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.583333333 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182592726408 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565658717094 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0298369998228 0.071462118173 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0923740290675 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375143556802 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.