The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems. So
who do you think should be responsible to solve it? Is it the governments,
organizations or each individual?
Nowadays, environmental problems have become a long-running dispute among the public all around the world, which leads to a moot question "who is responsible to tackle it?" Although some people argue that governments are in charge, I tend to believe that both humans and authorities are responsible.
To begin with, global warming is indeed bound up tightly with environmental issues, which means it might lead to both air pollution and carbon emissions. For example, a group of profound environmentalists, working at a prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to establish the relationship between global changes and released gases as well as industrialization. Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the contention that greenhouse gases are correlated negatively with not only fossil fuels but also energy needs.
Moreover, environmental reforms are undoubtedly attributable to citizens, in that it might lead to governmental interventions, legal reforms, and levying green taxes. A well-known example of such attributions is taking responsibility, which is cause for concern since it had been mistaken to take responsibility for granted. Had they protected natural resources in advance, they might have had the opportunity to protect the environment. Thus, the government could play an imperative role in preserving the environment.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that both persons and governments are responsible to solve the environmental problems. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ays, environmental problems have become a long-running dispute among the public all around the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85655737705 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47715651669 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668032786885 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0400699533 50.4703680194 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.9 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.25397266985 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0431484760877 0.242375264174 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.019486218259 0.0925447433944 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365227360353 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0310102729214 0.151781067708 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354112007477 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.94827586207 201% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.