Business today have no benefit to society and planet, they think about their own benefits.
Recently, the phenomenon of the interests of local or international businesses to gain all benefits and do not advocate them to societies or environment has sparked a heated debate. Although this issue has some catastrophic consequences as it is regarded by the substantial number of individuals both destructive and negative, others hold opponent views. I am inclined to believe that it can be minus as it might lead to some detrimental impacts for our planet.
From a social standpoint, the idea of allocating all benefits to businesses and excluding the environment or the nation from them can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact of undevelopment. From my own experience, when I was a university pupil, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these details. Firstly, all business activities have direct influence on countries. Every business needs to consume some sources and resources in order to exist. Hence, they should share some of their profits to their societies to compensate the consumed sources. It is because that governments motivate their citizens to pay the tax to reconstruct and rebuild the natural sources.
On the one hand, there is no doubt that the idea of sharing benefits to society or nature by companies has some opponents. Some businessmen or women asserted that governments should provide their materials and resources and they should not share their profits. They argue that their financial difficulties do not permit to share anything and they need all benefits in order to exist.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the merits of dedicating some of the companies' benefits to their country or environment are far outweigh their demerits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'sharing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'permit' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: sharing
...ir financial difficulties do not permit to share anything and they need all benefits in ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...y believe that the merits of dedicating some of the companies benefits to their country or ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, so, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 20.9802955665 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29020979021 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98678565552 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555944055944 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3586208759 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.384615385 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69230769231 7.25397266985 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262569865957 0.242375264174 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089548013327 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509976529774 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14805371995 0.151781067708 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560872501558 0.0609392437508 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.