Recently, the phenomenon of using the Internet instead of tradition classrooms and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate Although contested by many that online education is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that applying web instead of classroom tutors is a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, using the Internet to teach pupils can provide the society with some noticeable benefits which are rooted in the fact that reducing traffic congestion, as well as saving energy, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered huge economic impact while eliminating school classes. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both social and personal issues apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of education, spreading Internet and substituting teachers might increase the consequences of improved quality of study. Moreover, fundamental aspects of technology related to this reality that the demerits of implementing web education pertain to the knowledge available online. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of Internet application.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of replacing classroom teacher with Internet far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of web teaching prove the significance of eliminating teachers, but also pinpoint technology implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82231404959 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18344114453 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673553719008 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.3933482856 50.4703680194 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.9 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187065323325 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637414863171 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578137321214 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101275600436 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298623846691 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.35 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.94827586207 191% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.