Cheap overseas travel does more damage than good.
Discuss the extent you support with reasons and or examples.
It is argued by environmentalists and some people that relatively inexpensive air travel is damaging our environment and they say that it has little benefits. However, I believe that the amount of pollutants emitted by all aeroplanes in the world is far less than that of manufacturing industries and on road traffic combined. Moreover, it is promoting international trade and employment opportunities.
Firstly, some environmentally concerned people argue that the harmful gases emitted in the upper atmosphere are the major source of acid rains. Whereas, I think that the harmful carbon emissions will eventually be reaching to the same level also results in the same phenomenon. Thus, I believe that aeroplanes are not the major contributor to environmental damage.
On the other hand, low-cost air travel enables business people to expand their businesses into other countries as it is less expensive to travel frequently to manage their offices. As more and more people are travelling to other countries, governments needed to expand their airports which is creating employment opportunities. Furthermore, they are generating revenues in the form of Visa fees, Taxes and so on.
In conclusion, the environmental pollution caused by cheap overseas travel cannot be compared with the opportunities it is creating and hence should not be questioned.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ere are the major source of acid rains. Whereas, I think that the harmful carbon emissi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, moreover, so, thus, whereas, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 209.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52153110048 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26341044919 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 139.433497537 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593301435407 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 379.143842365 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5799125204 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.4 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6 7.25397266985 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122450996726 0.242375264174 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398642297203 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477596152966 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0720405285115 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048485457217 0.0609392437508 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.