cheap travel overseas travel does more damage than good.
These days, many companies have used variety of methods to travel their products, one of these is using ships to transfer their products. Some people believe that shipping items using overseas travel is very good because it's cheap, while others argue that overseas travel could lead to damage the materials due to shifting many times, either from ships to the ground or through truck. This essay will discuss the reson why shifting materials overseas is not good and it could lead to destroy the shifted materials.
Firstly, shifting materials overseas is very bad because it could lead to destruct the products. This shifted materials could be sensitive and may not resist the a lot of movements. For example, in Jordan, a lot of people complain about the products which have shifted using ships, where most of it are damaged due to bad dealing with these materials by people who work either at shifts or at the port. Therefore, shifting materials overseas is not good and could damage the products.
On the other hand, some people think that shifting materials using overseas travel is good because its cheap. Other shipping methods could cost people a lot of money, especially using planes. For example, shifting furniture from the USA to Jordan cost by plane costs people more than tripple. But these people are unaware of the fact that their products could be exposed to damage during shifting. Thus, shifting through overseas is not good because it damages the shifting materials.
In conclusion, shifting materials using cheap overseas travel is bad for shifting materials although it costs less money. In my opinion, I believe that shifting material using overseas travel is very bad and it is not appropriate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...s could be sensitive and may not resist the a lot of movements. For example, in Jorda...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is very bad and it is not appropriate.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.75862068966 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06315789474 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37078244854 2.71678728327 87% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 139.433497537 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445614035088 0.580463131201 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 429.3 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6998302809 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.071428571 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 6.9802955665 14% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 2.75862068966 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253268618864 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114535422603 0.0925447433944 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921697233819 0.071462118173 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188253226465 0.151781067708 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658543197655 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.32886699507 88% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 55.0591133005 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.