Children spend more time on television than other activities, who is responsible for this.
The topic of children spending more time on television than on other sports have become a heated debate. Although many people assert that family remembers and friends are responsible for children television viewing, the others refute this proposition saying that parents are responsible for children actions. This essay will discuss why parents are responsible for their children values and reach a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of arguments which find out why parents are held responsible for children television watching in which the most preponderant one is that parent give fewer times to youngsters due to busy social life. Furthermore, parents want to attend parties and gathering with friends, and children left at home there by resulting in more television watching. For instance, a study proved that about 30% of the children in every country have no outdoor activities and watch television because of busy parents. Hence, parents are directly responsible for their children TV watching.
Another pivotal aspect of this talk would be that some parents have a busy office life and get a very short time to rest thereby no interaction with kids at all. Furthermore, sometimes parents have to go outside of the city or country for business and children cannot go outside thereby no physical or outdoor activity offered. For instance, a survey revealed that only in the USA about 80% of the children spent time at home and not playing because of parents busy routines. Thus, due to parents work many children suffer and watch TV at home.
In conclusion, this essay discussed why parents are responsible for their children TV viewing in terms of busy social and physical life. Therefore, in my opinion, parents should give more career to children by involving them in different physical and mental activities to excel them for fruitful future life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 302.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19867549669 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63634390719 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509933774834 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 487.8 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0535650958 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.769230769 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363926612332 0.242375264174 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156081398747 0.0925447433944 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982757223008 0.071462118173 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260638049845 0.151781067708 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148892453344 0.0609392437508 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.