The importance of public transportation, which was always debatable has now become more controversial. It can be strongly agreed upon to the fact that building more roads than focusing on public transport has some favourable arguments in favour of it, however, there has always been some contention about it. This essay will elaborate on how focusing on building more roads introduce more problems and how expanding public transportation can solve these problems and thus leading to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons as to why building more roads have negative aspects, but the most alarming one lies from the fact that building more roads means congestion in cities, as this can be contributing factors to increase noise pollution and air pollution due to burning of fossil fuels. For instance, research in this area invariably shows that India's pollution rate has doubled after the new project of road construction was introduced in 2014. Therefore, the negative aspect of constructing more road is undeniable.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that increasing public transportation has some positive facets as well, as there are innumerable facts in favour of it, but the most predominant one stems from the fact that it is more convenient and affordable for the public, which will not only decrease the risk of global warming due to pollution but also decrease traffics and accident in highways. As an illustration, findings of some studies reveal that Japan accidents and traffic rate is 30% less compared to other developed countries as Japan mostly encourage using public transport. Hence, the importance of public transport cannot be denied.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of public transport is prominent, although its drawback should be well handled.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28428093645 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86203219514 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.160501151 50.4703680194 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 158.0 104.977214359 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9 20.9669160288 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223031888549 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893828115249 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368559004218 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129529879544 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399616151563 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.1260098522 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.