As cities expanding, some
people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of
public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads
for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or
experience to support.
One of the most conspicuous trends in today's world is the colossal upsurge in the number of people thinking that governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation. There is a widespread worry that merely building more roads for vehicle owning population cannot help the public. However I support building a better network of transportation and I will explain why in this essay.
There are countless reasons in support of my stance. The most predominant one is that having a better equipped network of traffic system not only allows the public to reach their destination safe but also helps in lesser distance travelled. One can not only benefit when it comes to being effective, but also helps in the prosperity of the entire society. Smart network of rails and roads helps the people living in both cities and villages.
Building more and more roads for just the vehicle owning population does not bring much value to both public and the governments. Sometimes governments will be wasting a lot of money on just constructing roads that are not much useful to majority of population. Since the cities are expanding, the government and construction companies should think of innovative ways to connect the existing roads with new roads and bring more connectivity.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can easily agree that creating better networks of public transportation is always beneficial than just building more roads for vehicular traffic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ning population cannot help the public. However I support building a better network of ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22406639004 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80388645265 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54356846473 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 379.8 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6428825478 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.454545455 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 7.25397266985 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242123969039 0.242375264174 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921589585538 0.0925447433944 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613490822567 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156795054118 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723864614454 0.0609392437508 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.