Recent the phenomenon of animals matter and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that animals claim can be a plus, and I will analyze all over this essay.
From a social standpoint, hurting animals can be provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues ,as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up.According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramification of both preservation kind of animals and prisoner victim apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, helping animals might increase the consequences of critical needs moreover, fundamental aspects of human fan relate to this reality that the demerits of pertain to relationship .As a tangible example some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively from vital issues. Hence, its correct to presumed the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of zoos be banded far outweigh its drawbacks.Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of the total ouccomes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 143, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e rooted in the fact that crucial issues ,as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextr...
^^
Line 2, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up.According to my own experience,...
^^
Line 2, column 201, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: According
...te outcomes, are inextricably bound up.According to my own experience, when I was a univ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... the demerits of pertain to relationship .As a tangible example some scientific re...
^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...he demerits of pertain to relationship .As a tangible example some scientific rese...
^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...he demerits of pertain to relationship .As a tangible example some scientific rese...
^^
Line 4, column 157, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Not
...os be banded far outweigh its drawbacks.Not only do the advantages of this unique p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60580912863 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1731970077 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.680497925311 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6551724138 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.5024630542 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 112.662036086 50.4703680194 223% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 168.875 104.977214359 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.125 20.9669160288 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.125 7.25397266985 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174530453261 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713097028849 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451105781867 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917626732498 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421887076754 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 12.6369458128 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.11 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 10.9458128079 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.85 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.68 8.32886699507 140% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.3980295567 135% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.