Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this.
The revolution in communication has a substantial impact in the modern world. Some people argue that the innovation in the communication has made lives of people better, while on the other hand, stands a perspective that the ways people interact now have brought some serious concerns. This essay will further discuss on both sides and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
To begin with, there are various ways how communication has turnaround the lives of people in a positive way and the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that the advancements in technology have offered a medium of instant, effective and easier way to talk. For instance, we now live in a world of video conferencing, Whatsapp, Skype, roaming calls where we can contact our long-lost friends without any barrier thus, replacing the conventional forms of telephones and telegrams. By this way, we can interact with our family and relatives quickly and conveniently even if they are far away.
In contrast, there are some drawbacks which can certainly overwhelm the potential benefits of means of communication. The most alarming one is that people no longer talk to each other face to face and are mostly glued to the screens of their smartphones and tablets. This has hampered the real interaction among people due to which they feel isolated and lonely. Hence, it is apparent why the revolutionary means of communication has made people recluse, dull and unsocial.
In views of the arguments outlined above, the impact of communication is prominent although there are minor downsides which can be well-handled if people maintain the social interaction between them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 92, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...tion has turnaround the lives of people in a positive way and the most conspicuous one stems from...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in contrast, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.156133829 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93434559087 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583643122677 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7255430772 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.090909091 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4545454545 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111133916568 0.242375264174 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475651140626 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411701804822 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.070398043931 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306518662985 0.0609392437508 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.