Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons of this change.
In these days, there is not denying the reality that communication has changed considerably over the last decade. While many people believe that the change brings about positive impact to people’s lives, other feel that the opposite is also correct. This essay offers some insights on both the merits and demerits of the development.
Perhaps, the greatest benefit people enjoy from the advancement in communication is the convenience that it brings about. As a matter of fact, with the advent of the mobile phones and the internet, people can keep in touch with one another regardless of physical distance and location. Such convenience would save a great deal of time and effort to send and receive messages. Another advantage of such development is that people can stay updated with the latest information thanks to the internet. To give an illustration, people can easily get the news around the world by reading online newspaper.
Nonetheless, like two sides of a same coin, communication advancement also creates many problems. The most obvious negative impact is the significant decline in physical interaction between humans and a sedentary lifestyle. This is due to the fact that people can easily make internet calls to update each other with the latest information and hence, physical gathering is no longer required. To give an illustration, instead of traveling to the meeting venue, nowadays people can just stay at home and attend online meetings.
In conclusion, form the above analysis, it is clear that while communication advancement allows people to enjoy great benefits, it also brings upon a number of drawbacks to others’ lives and the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
In these days, there is not denying the reality that communication has chan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, nonetheless, so, while, in conclusion, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27881040892 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88771741082 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579925650558 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9249083755 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.230769231 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0902081132427 0.242375264174 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359195824756 0.0925447433944 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436276107326 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0623078343486 0.151781067708 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472360522218 0.0609392437508 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.