Companies use advertisement to influence people to buy things sometimes which they don’t need. Give your opinion about the practices.
Nowadays, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see that marketing instrument like advertisement has become ubiquitous. There are myriad of academics who believe that such commercials encourage materialism. However, rest advocate otherwise. In this essay, I shall further elaborate both the side and lead to the plausible conclusion.
At the outset, there is a deluge of arguments which favor the above-mentioned notion that advertisements influence the purchasing decision of the consumers. Not only such attractive adverts attract people to make believe the benefits of their products, which are generally not up to the mark, but it also influences them to buy it even when such product is of no use to them. Moreover, the hefty cost of such commercials are added to the cost of the product and eventually, it is being shouldered by the consumer himself.
Another pivotal aspect of the argument is that advertisements attack the most sensitive and vulnerable section of the society that is young children and teenager, who cannot differentiate the wants from the needs. Moreover, buying the things which are not going to be used will cost not only to the buyer in terms of the money paid for the product but it will also add to the wastage of resources of the nation: a burning question across the globe.
To recapitulate, from the above-outlined arguments, one can conclude that combined efforts from the government, in terms of setting strict standards to be followed by companies in showing the accurate information about the product, and the alert consumers can alter the negative impact which advertisements do create on the mind of the customer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, there has been a colossal upsurge in the...
^^
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... rest advocate otherwise. In this essay, I shall further elaborate both the side ...
^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at combined efforts from the government, in terms of setting strict standards to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0059224951 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586080586081 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.4695267332 50.4703680194 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.4 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 7.25397266985 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158021047068 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468058408954 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466900746314 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818967756623 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392419959498 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.