One of the most significant current discussion in the companies is the level of involvement that the workers have in the decision-making process. What it is not clear yet are the implications of this approach, and the potential impacts whether positive or negative. This indicates a need to understand the various perceptions of the situation that exist among employee and employer.
The issue of allowing the workers to present ideas and express opinions have been a controversial and much-disputed subject within the field of human resource management. The aim of integrating the employees have been called to have a major problem regarding the level of decisions that workers are allowed to make. Then, the workers feel the constant need to be considered in any decision, which is inefficient in terms of time and resources. According to the study performed by the University of Cambridge, the intense involvement of workers lack proper structure and lead to chaos.
There is a consensus among social scientist that most people feel valued when the top hierarchy of the company listens to the workers' ideas. The self-esteem of the worker plays an important role in the overall outcome of the company. It is often argued that happier workers are more productive in the workplace, and without doubt, the level of involvement in the decision of the company has a direct correlation with the overall happiness of the employee. Previous studies have reported conclusively the quantitative and qualitative benefits of this new trend of management where every voice need to be heard.
Overall, considering the arguments on both side of the analysis, it seems evident that the participation of the members of the company in the decision making regardless the status has divergent consequences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 65, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... arguments on both side of the analysis, it seems evident that the participation ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 31.9359605911 150% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25694444444 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02324297254 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3941104643 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.166666667 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.91666666667 7.25397266985 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160625295387 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585438595176 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617767064073 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103646236016 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504223718776 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.