Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss?
It is argued that the decision making personalities of any organization should consider its employees' ideas and suggestions. This essay agrees with the concept of involving workers thoughts in taking decisions. This essay will first look at how employee contribution will help to find the depth of problems and then discuss how it contributes to more productivity.
Involvement of staff in the decision-making process will help the company chiefs to identify the ground reality of problems that the workforce is currently facing. There is a high possibility that the top level authorities are not completely aware of the real scenarios and the ramifications of any wrong decision-making if any. For instance, the company that I work for initially proposed a decision on arranging big busses in limited routes for company transportation. However, we voiced out that having mini busses in major routes can make it better and they agreed with it.
The feeling of being considered in decision making boosts employee satisfaction and improve motivation. These two factors are indeed crucial for high productivity from workers. The more times companies involve their staff in decision making the more the productivity. For instance, a recent study by the University of Melbourne found that the at least 38-48% of productivity rise is observed from employees who are playing an integrated part of key people who can make decisions.
In conclusion, letting staff contribute with their ideas in choosing a solution along with the top authorities of an organization will help to understand the reality of the problem, consequences of the proposed solution and also rise in productivity.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, so, then, at least, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36226415094 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13794403603 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554716981132 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0873435076 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.416666667 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196905221822 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667329509215 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595119660598 0.071462118173 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109506694894 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611268481265 0.0609392437508 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.